Target Atmospheric CO2: Where Should Humanity Aim?
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:39 pm
The latest paper from James Hansen and associates:
One thing to note is that one of the people behind this paper, David Beerling, is from the Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield -- perhaps we should ask him if he would be interested in doing a presentation on this issue to a public meeting?
I'll try to read the actual paper later tonight... The abstract:
James hansen wrote: The final version of "Target Atmospheric CO2: Where Should Humanity Aim?" in The Open Atmospheric Science Journal is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874282300802010217
You can click on the main paper and supporting material individually. The two are combined in one pdf on the GISS web site at http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abstracts/200 ... _etal.html
BTW, I think that the Supporting Material contains some interesting stuff.
NASA decided not to make a press release for the paper, but Yale did one http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/ ... 110708.php The draft press release that I wrote and "Q&A" about the paper are at http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/ ... Target.pdf
It is difficult to generate the attention that the topic deserves because the basic conclusions were already presented in my talk at the December 2007 AGU meeting. Also the first draft of the paper (available in arXiv, as is the final version) appeared on several blogs and was discussed in several newspapers, which discourages media attention to the final improved version.
The long delay between first draft and final paper was my fault. The principal demand of the journal referees, addition of a "caveats and uncertainties" section (section 4.5 in the main paper and section 18 in the Supplementary Material), could have been completed in a week or two, but it took me ~two months because of other obligations. I caused another delay by not checking typesetting in the proofs carefully enough, requiring an extra iteration of proofs. Bottom line: I think that the "Open" publication method, which includes full peer review but results in a paper freely available throughout the world, is promising and I intend to pursue it further.
http://www.columbia.edu/%7Ejeh1/mailing ... erland.pdf
One thing to note is that one of the people behind this paper, David Beerling, is from the Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield -- perhaps we should ask him if he would be interested in doing a presentation on this issue to a public meeting?
I'll try to read the actual paper later tonight... The abstract:
Abstract: Paleoclimate data show that climate sensitivity is ~3°C for doubled CO2, including only fast feedback processes. Equilibrium sensitivity, including slower surface albedo feedbacks, is ~6°C for doubled CO2 for the range of climate states between glacial conditions and ice-free Antarctica. Decreasing CO2 was the main cause of a cooling trend that began 50 million years ago, the planet being nearly ice-free until CO2 fell to 450 ± 100 ppm; barring prompt policy changes, that critical level will be passed, in the opposite direction, within decades. If humanity wishes to preserve a planet similar to that on which civilization developed and to which life on Earth is adapted, paleoclimate evidence and ongoing climate change suggest that CO2 will need to be reduced from its current 385 ppm to at most 350 ppm, but likely less than that. The largest uncertainty in the target arises from possible changes of non-CO2 forcings. An initial 350 ppm CO2 target may be achievable by phasing out coal use except where CO2 is captured and adopting agricultural and forestry practices that sequester carbon. If the present overshoot of this target CO2 is not brief, there is a possibility of seeding irreversible catastrophic effects.